@Kodama Danke, ich habe mich auf diesen Link verlassen. Wie viel dort nun der Richtigkeit halber zusammengetragen wurde, kann ich nicht ermessen.
@hANSaLBERS : Gefunden habe ich die vermeindlichen "Neuigkeiten" auf dieser Seite :
http://mostlymystery.com/found/ (Archiv-Version vom 02.09.2016)Die Seite ist sehr interessant, vor allem die Fragestellung, die meisten Fragen wurden hier allerdings auch schon gestellt. Hier sind sie eben nur noch einmal sehr übersichtlich zusammengefasst:
BONES
How is it that certain bones appear together on the banks of the river Culebre? Why so few bones and why mostly fragments? Where are the rest of them?
Why is there tissue attached to Lisanne’s bones but not to Kris’?
Why does the Prosecutor declare the girls died by dragging in the river when the pathologists say the bones show no sign of abrasion?
Why did the Prosecutor cite wild animals as a possible secondary cause when there were no signs of animal activity on the bones or clothes?
Why did Lisanne’s foot “break off” at the ankle — without trauma?
How did Kris’ bones come to have high levels of phosphorus? How were they “Chemically Treated?”
Why would the skeletons be completely smashed but cheap and fragile sunglasses remain undamaged?
BOOTS
Why was Lisanne’s foot, still in her boot, found behind a tree?
Was the boot rinsed between the time it was found and the time it was laid out on plastic near the scene, thus removing a possible crystalline crust on the bottom? (In the in situ picture the boot is dry; on plastic it is wet; both photos were presumably taken on the day Prosecutor Pitti and her team arrived at Altos Los Romeros. Hat tip: websleuths.com)
How can the second boot found (blue) be reconciled with the photos of Kris and Lisanne, who are shown wearing brown boots?
MESSAGES
Why is there not a single “help me” marker — initials scraped into a tree, arrows, an SOS sign, etc?
Why are there no messages of any kind?
PHONES & CAMERA
Why the intervals in phone use? Why the specific pattern?
Why are there no stored text messages in the phone to their parents?
Why the 87 black photos? (Note: 90 pictures were taken the early morning of the 8th. The families have released two but there is a third that is believed to contain images. We do not know when or if this picture will be released.)
Why didn’t they document what happened to themselves in photos — i.e. there are no pictures of their route, injuries, threatening animals, etc. after 2 p.m.
What do the two nighttime pictures of stones mean, especially the red bags and sticks?
CLOTHES
Why did Kris take her shorts off?
Why were both bras of the girls taken off and put in the backpack?
Why have there been no other undergarments found?
Why are Kris’ shorts neatly laid out?
OTHER PERSONAL EFFECTS
If the backpack had been in the water, why weren’t the contents decayed and why were they in such good condition?
Was the backpack planted? Prosecutor Pitti calls such insinuations “Irresponsible” and “without foundation.” (Panama News)
MISCELLANEOUS (BUT IMPORTANT)
Why do the statements of all five witness contradict the photo evidence?
Why was there no contact for 11 days when the girls had to have come near habitations and other people (presuming they were not abducted)?
Why didn’t they turn back after they placed their 1st emergency call?
Since they got into trouble so early in the trip, as evidenced by their emergency calls, how could they have fallen into a river 12 hours away?
A French couple hiked the same trail the next day and were told by a guard they encountered that he had heard screams the day before. Have these people been questioned? Has the guard been?
———
And new in the last few days: what do the 34 fingerprints just found by the Dutch Forensic Institute mean? There are 13 on the backpack, 12 on the phones, 6 on a bra, and 3 on the camera. PanamaAmerica.com reports that no DNA samples were taken on any of these items but the backpack and now that they have been sent to the DFI, the evidence is considered contaminated.