@behind_eyes @JamieStarr Warum verschwand wohl das Gehirn?
Dr. George Burkley either suspected or believed that Kennedy may have been struck in the head by more than one missile. He was not called by the warren commission to testify about his experience beginning at the motorcade, at the Dallas emergency room, in Maryland for the autopsy, etc; he only wrote a 11/23/1963 Death Certificate and a 11/27/1963 affidavit which did not mention any specific evidence about the head wounds except the fact that they were fatal.
In this 10/17/1967 interview at the Kennedy Library, Burkley stated "My conclusion in regard to the cause of death was the bullet wound which involved the skull. The discussion as to whether a previous bullet also enters into it, but as far as the cause of death the immediate cause was unquestionably the bullet which shattered the brain and the calvarium". The interviewer did not bring up the possibility of more than one gunshot to Kennedy's head, Burkley did. Independently. When asked "Do you agree with the Warren Report on the number of bullets that entered the President's body?", he replied "I would not care to be quoted on that". Then, a 3/18/1977 memo from Dr. Burkley's attorney said "he has information in the Kennedy assassination indicating that others besides Oswald must have participated", and that Burkley would be available to interview. A short August 1977 interview report written by Dr. Purdy of the HSCA medical panel reads "Dr. BURKLEY said the doctors didn't section the brain and that if it had been done, it might be possible to prove whether or not there were two bullets. Dr. BURKLEY thinks there was one but concedes the possibility of there having been two". Burkley then gave a 11/12/1978 affidavit to the HSCA saying "Had the Warren Commission deemed to call me, I would have stated why I retained the brain and the possibility of two bullets having wounded President John F. Kennedy's brain would have been eliminated", "I supervised the autopsy and directed the fixation and retention of the brain for future study of the course of the bullet or bullets". And finally, author Henry Hurt interviewed Burkley in 1982 (Reasonable Doubt, page 49):
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25088-where-is-the-exit/?page=6&tab=comments#comment-383390Hast du dich nun mal endlich mit dem Schadensbild beschäftigt,
@behind_eyes?
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/The_Moving_Head_Wounds.htmlOder wenn du nicht lesen willst:
Original anzeigen (0,3 MB)https://whowhatwhy.org/2018/04/25/jfk-assassination-the-tell-tale-brain/Schädelfrakturen sprechen für einen tieferen Eintritt bei der external ocipital protuberance, so wie es Autopsiebericht und WC darstellten
JFK Skull Fracture Analysis Cold Case
Externer Inhalt
Durch das Abspielen werden Daten an Youtube übermittelt und ggf. Cookies gesetzt.
EDIT:
das ist besser, weil ausführlicher
JFK Skull Fracture Lines
Externer Inhalt
Durch das Abspielen werden Daten an Youtube übermittelt und ggf. Cookies gesetzt.
Hier die Zeichnung Rybergs, die für die Commission angefertigt wurde, die aber eine falsche Kopfneigung zeigen
Original anzeigen (0,4 MB)Hier die offizielle, "berichtigte" Darstellung des Eintrittspunktes
Original anzeigen (0,4 MB)Da du ja sehr exakt bei Winkeln bist, bin ich auf deine Meinung gespannt
@alleUns ist ja geläufig, dass Captain Fritz in seinen Notize zu den Verhören sich die Angabe Oswalds notierte, draußen gestanden zu haben
"Out with Bill Shelley in front,”
Original anzeigen (0,3 MB)Neu ist, dass sich in den Notizen von FBI-Agent Hosty sich auch eine ähnliche Angabe findet
Then went outside to watch P. parade
http://www.prayer-man.com/then-went-outside-to-watch-p-parade/ (Archiv-Version vom 12.02.2019)Oswald gab an, im ersten Stock zu Mittag gegessen zu haben und dann rausgegangen zu sein, um sich die Parade anzuschauen...
Das passt zu seiner Angabe zu den beiden Afroamerikanern, die er nur gesehen haben kann, wenn er im Erdgeschoss war
JamieStarr schrieb:War es ein Teilmantelgeschoss, ein Vollmantelgeschoss oder ein Hohlspitzgeschoss? Jede Art verursacht nämlich ganz spezifische Verletzungen.
