Richard on 26 April 2022 at 11:34Quelle: https://www.mh370search.com/2022/03/14/mh370-wspr-technical-report/
@all,
My home has been broken into and the police are investigating. They say it was a very professional job and suspect involvement of a state actor.
I have received a growing number of death threats and hate email on both private and public email accounts from anonymous senders or people impersonating names from the MH370 passenger list.
One of my private email accounts has been hacked and that account is in the process of being closed down. I have now moved to a much more secure email provider which requires double authentication. My public email address at richard@mh370search.com has not been breached by hackers.
My website is subject to daily multiple so called brute force attacks by hackers using multiple IP addresses from all over the globe, but fortunately due to the sophisticated security system no one has been able to break in as administrator of the website.
Academics who are peer reviewing my work have been contacted directly by Victor Iannello to try and dissuade them for conducting a peer review. Victor Iannello denies any such contact and has publicly called me an outright liar. I invite Victor Iannello to sue me and I will be calling witnesses and providing written proof of his attempted dissuasion of a peer review.
My private & confidential work on Moskva was leaked from my hacked email to the press but immediately deleted. Mick Gilbert a detractor of my work recovered the deleted article from the Google cache and republished it without permission. I have not published anything on Moskva and will not make any comment on or off the record on the subject. I have been strongly advised by the UK Military Intelligence not to make any public statements on this subject. Others who have published information, even officially on behalf of NATO, have had their email and social media accounts hacked, mobile phones hacked, biometrics stolen and issues with identity theft, bank accounts and credit card accounts. They required the support of UK Military Intelligence GCHQ to access email and social media accounts again, protect their information, identity and assets.
Nils Schiffhauer claims to have set up a new journal to facilitate a peer review. Nils Schiffhauer mocks the president of the German Radio Amateur Club (DARC), Dipl.-Ing. Christian Entsfellner, DL3MBG, with an unfounded statement that he supposedly tried to prevent this publication. Nils Schiffhauer has publicly invited me on Victor Iannello’s blog to formally submit my work for his peer review. Nils Schiffhauer ignores the fact that he was banned from my website on 8th December 2021. Nils Schiffhauer continues to try to hack into my website using a different IP address each time without success. At the same time Nils Schiffhauer has published an article calling me an inveterate liar (In German: “Richard Godfrey lügt wie gedruckt”). Nils Schiffhauer has been subject of criminal proceedings for allegedly illegally monitoring radio communications made by the police and other security services. Nils Schiffhauer is now publicly predicting my disappearance.
For the record, Nils Schiffhauer from Victor Iannello’s website is one of three people who are banned from my website. Nils Schiffhauer was banned from the German Amateur Radio Club in 1994 for his damaging behaviour bringing the club into disrepute and has been fighting this ban in the courts and in the media ever since. A second person banned was a commenter from Victor Iannello’s website called @tom who has tried to submit hoax comments on my website using multiple email addresses from different countries but from one and the same IP address impersonating scientists who are deceased. The detractor even boasted about his achievement on Victor Iannello’s website. A third person banned was a Chinese commenter called @z00 for calling another Chinese commenter an “idiot!”
Er war dann so gebauchpinselt, dass er weder über "canal ray and positron physics" gestolpert ist noch sonstwie geprüft hat, dass Emil Rupp ein gigantischer Betrüger mit gefälschten pseudowissenschaftlichen Ergebnissen war Wikipedia: Emil RuppPapaya64 schrieb am 20.03.2022:Emil Rupp on 20 March 2022 at 20:15
@richard, thank you so much for your outstanding work! The scientific community will be proud of you. The detractors completely fail to understand that the radar equation is rooted in canal ray and positron physics that have been described long before the age of WSPR propagation. Don’t be fooled by them. He who is able to bridge the gap between the old and the new will win, and MH370 will be found because of your discovery!
Richard on 21 March 2022 at 10:34Quelle: https://www.mh370search.com/2022/03/14/mh370-wspr-technical-report/
@all,
A detractor from Victor Iannello’s website has tried to submit hoax comments on my website using multiple fake email addresses from different countries but from one and the same IP address impersonating scientists who are deceased. There are email providers that allow you to take out fake email addresses such as albert.einstein@… This is surprising behaviour for mature educated scientists and engineers.
The detractor even boasted about his achievement on Victor Iannello’s website. The detractor further claimed that a long list of positive comments on my website are faked. However the author of each comment knows that their comment is genuine.
As a result all the detractor’s comments on my website have been deleted and he has been banned from my website.
As another consequence, I have been forced to implement tighter security on my website. I have tried to keep an open policy on communications so that everyone could comment as they wished. If you are new to the website, this new security means until you have had one approved comment you will have to go through a moderation step. Once your first comment is approved, then you will be free to make further comments as you wish.
It is obvious that this new security step will not stop a hardline detractor, who makes a genuine comment and follows it up with a hoax comment. If my website continues to be attacked with hoax comments, then all comments will go into a moderation queue, which will result in a delay for genuine commenters.
This is presumably the goal of the detractors, to deter, delay, discourage and prevent an open communication and discussion of our work.
Iwie trägt das russische Handschrift. Denen trau ich jetzt ALLES zu. Mich würde interessieren was für Personen oder auch Fracht die an Bord hatten. Weiß Einer, ob man mit einer solchen Maschine auch unterhalb des Radars fliegen kann?
Schon krass
Inwiefern?
Denen trau ich jetzt ALLES zu.Traurig, da hat die aktuelle Propaganda ganze Arbeit geleistet.
Mich würde interessieren was für Personen oder auch Fracht die an Bord hatten.Steht ausführlich im Abschlussbericht, Google is your friend.
Weiß Einer, ob man mit einer solchen Maschine auch unterhalb des Radars fliegen kann?Kann man nicht.
Aviation experts doubt, however, that a commercial airliner could pull off the kind of very low-altitude, nap-of-the-Earth (NOE) flying that military pilots use to avoid line-of-sight radar. It’s one thing for a crackerjack captain to buzz the ground on a nice sunny day, “but at night, in unfamiliar terrain, it’s very, very dicey,” says Lt. Col. (Ret.) Barry Codron, a former B-52 squadron commander.Quelle: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-do-you-hide-a-boeing-777/
Military jets carry special equipment to help pilots fly low without crashing. The B-52, for example, employs terrain-avoidance radar, a forward-looking infrared pod and a steerable TV window. Passenger planes like the Boeing 777-200ER have none of that—and for good reason: They were not meant to ferry nuclear weapons over the North Pole and evade Soviet air defenses.
Würde Sinn machen, wenn man davon ausgeht, dass die Maschine absichtlich zum Absturz gebracht wurde. Ich tendiere mittlerweile immer mehr zu der, zugegebenermaßen etwas phantastischen Verschwörungstheorie, dass dies per remote hijacking passiert ist. Flugexperten machen sich schon lange Gedanken darüber, so eine Technologie im Falle von Entführungen einzusetzen, es ist also kein Hirngespinst, siehe dazu:
Die Idee wurde 2017 u. a. von Norman Davies postuliert und gilt als widerlegt, da Boeing zwar nach 9/11 mit solchen Technologien zur Terrorabwehr experimentiert hat, die Maschinen von Malaysia Airlines aber gar nicht nachrüstbar gewesen wären.
Ja natürlich, aber nicht mit der dafür erforderlichen Technologie.
Bauzeit einer neuen A380 ist ca. 80 Tage. Ist jetzt zwar ein anderes Flugzeug, aber wieso sollte es bei Boeing anders sein?
Danke für den Fachbegriff BUAP, sonst hätte ich es hier nie gefunden. Beim Überfliegen der Beiträge ist mir aber nur aufgefallen, dass ein heimlicher Einbau angeblich ausgeschlossen wird, die Begründung hierfür habe ich aber nicht gefunden.Zz-Jones schrieb:BUAP war in 9M-MRO nicht verbaut.
Kann man millionenfach hier im Thread nachlesen.
MH370 stürzte mMn kurz vor Java ab.
Demnach also eine Entführung, die in einem Abschuss durch Indonesien endete?
Indonesien weiß zudem deutlich mehr als sie zugeben.
Das wären so meine Eckpunkte. Möglichkeiten gäbe es aber auch dabei immer noch genügend.
Wie gesagt, es gibt viele Möglichkeiten.
