Bellingcat.kokokokoko schrieb:Ok, und kannst du das auch begründen? Was ist daran nicht neutral?
Das die meisten Projektile runde Löcher machen ist klar, das Schrapnelle und zwar die einer BUK, die aus flachen Rechtecken bestehen, runde Löcher machen kann ich mir kaum vorstellen.
nette Begründung...
Identitätslose stage actors, die je nach Bedarf mal hier mal da auftauchen (Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon etc.), ansonsten aber tief unter der Erde (im Hohlraum, ihr wisst schon :)) im Schlummermodus auf den nächsten Event warten. Buchen kann man diese übrigens unter einer Nummer, die u.a. die Zahlen 23, 11 und 9 beinhaltet. Genaueres darf ich dazu aber nicht sagen, sonst machen SIE mich zu einem Tall White, und meine ganze Sonnenbräune wäre dahin. Und das geht ja mal gar nicht.Hape1238 schrieb:Wo sind die in Amsterdam zugestiegen "Scheinpassagiere" geblieben ?
Lachkrampf!
In parallel to this, the CIA were able to procure a BUK missile launcher, crew it with Moscow accented Russian speaking men who knew how to operate it, cross “rebel” lines during a war undetected so as to appear to all that they were in fact from Russia with Moscow accents. As the BUK system requires targeting info from a command vehicle, they were able hack into this system to receive the needed data and pose on the radio system as a “rebel” unit to avoid suspicion. They then appeared to deliberately use it to shoot down MH17 and not the cargo plane that was also in the area. All this was done cunningly to discredit Russia to make to seem as if a SU25/27 shot down MH17 to discredit Russia.Das ist sogar seriöser als Gabi Wolff und Propagandaschau zusammen!
After pretending to shoot down MH17, this CIA unit were able to then travel with this BUK back through “rebel” lines to remove the evidence and also arrange for the field to be ploughed in the middle of a war-zone so there were no track or burn marks.. The entire of the Ukraine army in the area knew of this plan and knew not to shoot at this particular BUK vehicle, now carrying one missile less. The CIA we able to convince the “rebels” to place a vehicle the same size as a BUK under a cover and send it back to Russia on a truck. This was to make it look like Russia had sent the BUK into “rebel” territory so as to discredit Russia.
On the ground shortly after MH17 fell to earth with the genetically modified, three month old corpses in it, a “rebel” would double bluff the CIA’s attempt to discredit Russia by claiming in a tweet that they shot down MH17. This would be an extended part of a double bluff beginning 4 months previous when there was strong suspicion that Ukraine would undertake an operation like this with the CIA. In such an operation it was feared Ukraine would, as its part of the effort to discredit Russia, work to deny itself a major battlefield advantage against the “rebels” by shooting down its own aircraft from May (see picture below), whilst the genetically modified bodies from MH370 were being stored. The “rebels” would continue to double bluff the Ukrainians by claiming they were shooting down aircraft with man-pads “bought from a shop” whereas in fact it is clear that Ukraine was shooting its own aircraft down.
Immediately after MH17 crashed, several phone calls would take place by men with Russian accents discussing that “rebels” had in fact shot down the aircraft with the BUK they lied about having. These calls were released by the CIA to make it look like Russian backed “rebels” were involved. Despite Russia’s massive intelligence penetration of Ukraine and our proclivity for releasing hacked phones calls that make the USA look bad, we have decided not to release the phone records we have which show this was in fact a Ukrainian operation to discredit Russia. It is absolutely NOT because such calls do not exist.
The culmination of this double bluff was to ensure the integrity of the evidence of the MH17 crash site by preventing international observers from viewing the site for weeks and allowing locals to loot the wreckage for anything of value. This was not being done to remove any parts of the crash or to plant missile components with “property of the CIA” stamped on them.
So you see, there is no evidence it was Russia or the “rebels” at all.
du kannst machmal so ein troll sein.....wie lange geht das video ?
Ich hatte von der Szene schonmal Fotos gepostet. Entweder die laden die Raketen da munter durcheinander oder es gibt doch nicht nur die feste Abschussreihenfolge. (was aus meiner Sicht auch Sinn machen würde z.b. bei einem Rohrkrepierer)
Das du ein Witzbold scheinst, hab ich ja schon bemerkt.
sprichst du über das Video hier von ..
