Lang lang (nein, nicht der chinesische Pianist) hat's ja gedauert,Mauberzaus schrieb:Hast du nicht gelernt, dass dies Lügner sind, die den unschuldigen Ozzy ins Gefängnis bringen wollen? Du solltest wissen, dass keine Frau geschrien haben kann - stimmt nämlich nicht mit Pistorius' Version überein.
“Carl’s vehicle was hit head-on by another car that had swerved from the opposite side of the [N] highway into… oncoming traffic,” his uncle Arnold Pistorius said in a statement.http://citizen.co.za/223409/carl-pistorius-danger-crash/
Nel hat die gehörten Schreie der Nachbarn, Forensik und Ballistik auf seiner Seite und vor allem, das, was am meisten wiegt: das erbärmliche Kreuzverhör von Oscar.
dazu:Evidence1 schrieb:"Wegen hoher Prozesskosten: Pistorius verkauft Villa für weniger als erhofft"
The four-bedroom luxury home in Silverwoods Country Estate in Pretoria was bought by Louwtjie Louwrens who apparently intends to rent it out.Also selbst einziehen möchte Louwtjie Louwrens vielleicht nicht, da schreibt die Presse wieder mal unterschiedliches.
(...)
At the time the 27-year-old's lawyer Brian Webber said in a statement: "It has become necessary to sell Mr Pistorius's home in the Silver Woods Country Estate in Pretoria in order for him to raise the necessary funds to cover his increasing legal costs.”http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Oscar_Pistorius/Pistorius-sells-Pretoria-house-for-R45m-20140731
Anyone who believes Oscar sold his house to help cover his legal fees, has bought into his lies again. There is no money issue in that family...their money runs deep. It's all about receiving public pity. Even if his career is over, he will always be a molly coddled brat, wearing the best clothes, driving the best cars and living in the best homes. His family will look after him. To me this is a tactic of his in case all he gets is a fine sentence so that he can plead poverty and get his fine reduced and save his uncles some money, and protect his investments. There Is a reason for everything they do snd say!
I think this is just another Oscar Pistorius family con. Sold to a mining consultant ...mm? Bet it's someone in old uncle Arnold's fold, keeping it safe for OP, and thereby creating the illusion that poor OP had to "sell" his home because the state has brought this upon OP. Not that I care two hoots about the house. I just feel this is another scam to illicit public sympathy. This is how the rich, launder money when they are about to be sued. I bet Arnold has safely transferred OPs money safely so that it appears he has nothing. Justice will triumph anyway.
https://www.facebook.com/Justice4ReevaSteenkamp/posts/660132560731983
Karyn Maughan @karynmaughan
Limpopo police: both Carl Pistorius and the driver of the Hyundai who collided with him had to be cut out of their cars. @eNCAnews
Karyn Maughan @karynmaughan · 2m
Karyn Maughan @karynmaughan · 24 Min.
Police stress that case of reckless and negligent driving almost always opened in case of head-on collision.
Limpopo police: the other driver in the Carl Pistorius crash is a Mr Tshabalala. He is in a very serious condition. @
Karyn Maughan @karynmaughan · 19 Min.
Limpopo police: both drivers in Carl Pistorius crash had blood tested for alcohol. Officers on scene say no sign either drunk
https://twitter.com/karynmaughan (Archiv-Version vom 31.05.2014)
Dolus Directus (direct intent), is where the accused meant to perpetrate the prohibited conduct, or to bring about the criminal consequence and where the consequences of an action were both foreseen and desired by the perpetrator. You want to kill someone, so you shoot him. In this case the perpetrator had a specific victim in mind and then went about killing him or her.
Dolus eventualis exists where the accused does not mean to actually cause the unlawful consequence which follows from his conduct, but foresees or should foresee the possibility of the consequences ensuing, and nonetheless proceeds with his conduct. An example would be of an assault where a perpetrator gets into a fight and uses a knuckle duster to beat up the victim, not actually intending to kill the victim, and the victim dies.
Culpable homicide has been defined simply as the unlawful negligent killing of a human being. The essential difference with this crime from those mentioned above lies in the fact that the fault in this crime stems from negligence (culpa) and not intent. The test in determining whether the accused is guilty of this crime lies in the question – “what a reasonable person would have done given the same circumstances?http://whosyourdadic.com/2014/04/09/the-oscar-pistorius-trial-what-did-he-do/
Mir war neu, dass es bei einer Verurteilung nach "murder" kein Höchststrafmass gibt. Viele sehen das als die Mitte und bei 15 Jahren an, während "premeditated murder" mit 25 Jahren geahndet wird.
Ich denke der Dolus eventualis sollte realistischerweise beweisbar sein, anderes wie Totschlag müsste wegfallen, weil er ganz einfach im Kreuzverhör nicht überzeugend genug auftrat und er kaum zum Ausdruck bringen konnte, dass es für ihn keine andere Möglichkeit zu handeln gab und dies eine nachvollziehbare Reaktion eines vernunftbegabten Menschen in der gegebenen Situation war. Bei Pistorius hat man weder eine GAD, noch eine geistige Beeinträchtigung diagnostiziert, ob die körperliche Behinderung schwer genug wiegt, um einen Rechtfertigungsgrund zu liefern und wieweit der in das Urteil einfliessen und dieses mildern würde, bleibt abzuwarten. Dies käme natürlich nur unter der Voraussetzung zustande, als dass Masipa bereit ist, seine Story irgendwie noch als Möglichkeit zu akzeptieren.....Leicht dürfte sie sich bereits damit nicht tun.KlaraFall schrieb:Ich denke deshalb so ( dolus directus ), weil Nel die Intention bewiesen hat. Natürlich war das nicht vorher geplant, doch 4x schiessen wiegt schon schwer.
Da es nach dem ersten Schuss, laut Zeugen, Schreie gab, ist es für mich ab dem 2. Schuss auch ein eiskalter Mord. Nicht zufällig hörte er dann auf.
Wann wurden diese beiden Schüsse abgefeuert?
