1. Hab ich mit der Skeptiker-Bewegung Ortegas selektivität und deren Motivation angesprochen die hier als Argumentation übertragen wird
2. Lass ich mich ungern drohen..
3. werde ich hier seit seite1 ad hominem angegangen .. aber wenn man sich wehrt wird schnell der Button gedrückt..^^ naja lassen wir dass "ICH" bin ja unsachlich . oder besoffen!
back to topic:
FrankD schrieb:Auch hier stelle ich fest, dass Du, um unliebsame Zeugen vom Tisch zu wischen, trickst
Nein ich glaube dem schon dass der den Himmel voller Flugzeuge gesehen hat.Übrigens hab "ICH" den Zeugen bereits im EP eingebracht..Ich Zweifle nur Ortega als Mitglied der Skeptiker Bewegung an was eine vorurteilsfreie Objektivität nicht gewährleistet...Oder stell dir vor der nur würde schreiben dass der Fall nicht erklärbar ist! *Rausschmiss* Gerade das Interview lässt einiges durchblicken mit dem Zeugen Stanley.. Darauf wird ja nicht eingegangen.. Aber Interessannt ist bei so vielen Zeugen die einzigartig in einem Fall sind dem völlig widersprechen und man bleibt bei einem hängen..ein einziger der dass sagt gegen Tausend!. darunter gibt es viele versierte Leute die übrigens auch die Flares der Range kennen und zu unterscheiden wissen.. ..wer wischt was weg? Soll ich von tricks anfangen über X- flares Verdrehungen den gesammten thread..? das ist Faktum&Nachlesbar.!..zur Manipulation darf ich ja nichts mehr schreiben sonst heisst es wieder ich "unterstelle " etwas..
Ich kopiere hier etwas rein von einem User der sich bemüht aber auch die Lust vergangen ist hier reinzuposten..(Ich hoffe die kommt wieder)
Das ist der Brief von Charles M. Bryer :
There were not one or two events, but many events for many hours on March 13, 1997 starting at 5:20 pm until 5:30 am the next morning when a Boeing crew witnessed a mile wide silent V craft with hugs lights hovering over the tarmack at Sky harbor International AP. And let us not forget that I captured the SAME phenomena in the SAME location during our close 1885 sighting, two months before the mass sighting and during the mass sighting [confirmed the next morning in the 1997 cases by air traffic controllers at Sky harbor as appearing at 1,000 altitude in Class B airspace. They were NOT flares. Most skeptics immediately feed into the 'flare theory', even though I speak quite clearly in the book about the failed attempt of three air national guard units trying to reinact the "Phoenix Lights" on March 7, 2000. It was more of a joke, as you can see in this TV news report. Bottom line, the "Phoenix Lights" have NEVER been re-enacted
The lights did nor appear to have any resemblance to any type of pyrotechnical flares that I am familiar with.As we discussed,there are basically two different types of aircraft flares:Illumination flares and decoy flares:the illumination flares are designed to provide wide area lighting,wether for airborne photography or ground observation.These flares are normally attached to a parachute and burn with a white light
for up to a minute or longer as they descend.Photo flares are basically a big flashbulb and go off with an instantaneous explosion and release of a brillant flash of white light of very short duration (a few fractions or a second).Both of these flares normally produce significant amounts of white smoke that would be visible for a long distance.Decoy flares,on the other hand,are designed to trick infrared guided missiles into attacking the flare and ignoring the aircraft that dropped them.Ejected is a better word than dropped as most decoy flares are simply burning bricks of pyrotechnical material that are ejected from their launchers when a missile is detected approaching the plane.They typically burn for a few seconds at most.
Since the lights that were depicted on your videos appeared to be both stationary and of a long duration (with no visible smoke) it is my opinion that they were some kind of artificial light and not any type of military or commercial aircraft pyrotechnical flares that I am aware of.
Something was definitely up in the Phoenix sky that night,and it did not appear to be any normal type of aircraft that I am familiar with,either civilian or military! Sorry I missed it
Good investigating
Charles M Byers,President
Er war so frei und schrieb Dr. Kitei auch an an die jetzt zurückschrieb:
Thanks so much for your kind interest and words. Thrilled that you enjoyed the book and hope you'll also check out our internationally award winning Documentary
In addition, if your friend read Dr. Bruce Maccabee's thorough 1998 report, he would have seen that Dr. M only analyzed the BOOMERANG videos, not mine of three end lights of a giant V or the arrowhead footage, both taken BEFORE 10 pm. He makes the point that mine did not coordinate in time or formation with the two boomerang videos, which were captured AFTER 10 PM. You can read his recent statement and what else Dr. M discovered in detail on the Phoenix Lights Network website. [full report at the bottom of
http://www.thephoenixlights.net/Missing_Time.htm]
Wishing you a beautiful New Year, filled with optimal health, happiness and peace!
Light and love,
Dr. Lynne
Lynne D. Kitei, M.D.
Executive Producer, The Phoenix Lights Network
www.thephoenixlights.net
Die Frau mag vill. leicht Esoterisch angehaucht sein und einigen Sachen in der Doku sind anzuzweifeln. Dennoch gibt es Punkte Ansätze die wichtig,Interessant und aufgrund Ihrer Vor-Ort Aktivität zum Fall bedeutsam sind..
Grüsse
:kiff: smoki
