Hier ein Bericht von einer der führenden Analytiker Russlands:
Alexander Dugin: What is the probable Russian future. Will it exist or not?
This is the fifth time to Russia to defend its sovereignty in front of a real threat to lose it. It happened in the past.
• 1991 - loss of sovereignty of USSR, the Big Russia, and the decay, in the time of which modern Ukraine has been formed;
• 1993 - loss of sovereignty of Russian Federation. Pro-American liberal groupings came to power after shooting of the patriotic parliament and the consequence of it was the first Chechen military campaign;
• 1999 - explosions of buildings in Moscow, Basaev’s invasion in Daghestan, the arrival of Putin and the second Chechen military campaign. Putin restored Russia’s sovereignty;
• 2008 - Russia was provoked by attack on Tskhinvali. The committing of troops and the prevention of collapse of Russian state organization in Northern Caucasia , has fixed firm the Russian position on post-soviet space – sovereignty was affirmed and strengthened.
The fifth time is now. Results are not clear yet. Either we maintain and strengthen our sovereignty (this time those two mean the same), or… it’s all over. (Remember the fate of USSR and Berkut, etc. )
So.
There was a coup d'etat in Kiev. The atlanticist liberal-nazi junta has come to power. This junta is a part of American hegemony network, a segment of the new world order that is desperately trying to save itself. There is another adjoining segment of the same network in Russia. It prevailed in the 90th, exerted influence in 2000th, was about to come back to power in 2008-2012, but it was pushed off again by Putin in 2012.
The coup d’etat in Ukraine is the success of this network activity. I remind that this all happened because of Yanukovych’s step to rapprochement with Russia. Everything else is just a cover.
But this won’t be the end. The coup d’etat is going to get to Russia. Kissinger doesn’t prevaricate about it. “I think he (Putin) thinks that this is a dress rehearsal for what we would like to do in Moscow”- said Kissinger. (
http://joinfo.ua/politic/823767_Genri-Kissindzher-pre..) What does it mean “ we would like to do”? This means that the fifth column in Russia is in a state of combat readiness. We have seen the way of ruining of power structure – Party of Regions and Yanukovych are the vivid examples. It’s also easy to see the probable way of the end of minion corruption officials. It’s not only the fate of the Crimea and the East of Ukraine that Putin is supposed to settle in front of the Kiev’s junta. Now he determines the fate of Russia, and even more – the fate of the world history. If he gives an appropriate response, he will have to face the frantic resistance of the world American Empire, who shows that it’s in a good condition and displays that Europe is under its nail. But if Putin doesn’t decide something to undertake, the battlefield will move place to Moscow. The Russian segment of liberal-nazism, where nazis are in the role of useful fools for liberal masters, doesn’t have such a mass basis like in Ukraine, but it can be found in the upper realms of society and political elite not less strongly.
We know Putin is not Yanukovych and he has Russian people who are ready to support him. But Americans and Ukrainian Nazis demand to prove it. They defy Putin: yes, of course, you’re not Yanukovich, but who knows…?
Balance of risks? Risks are equal: not to accept Ukrainian junta, to support the Crimea and the East of Ukraine (the same thing at the present) means a conflict with the USA and its European puppets. To accept the junta as a legal government is just like to betray Berkut and to allow the next step of eradication of Russia (inside and outside). The fifth column is mobilized. Putin is under great pressure (inside and outside). The main thing now is to judge the Ukrainian incident as illegal coup d’etat and to refuse to accept legitimacy of rebels. It means to refuse the sovereignty to Ukraine in its present political state as it had been done in the case of Georgia, when Georgia wanted to control Tskhinvali and Sukhumi. The accepting of the Kiev's junta would become an enormous strike on the sovereignty of Russia. It would pose a question of capability of existence of some kind of sovereignty at all.
The world has froze. And it did so correctly. At these minutes is being determined the course of world history.
Larry08 schrieb:Klingt für mich alles sehr vernünftig und überlegt
