Der Mensch Jens Söring

Venice2009 schrieb:das habe ich ja auch nicht behauptet. Allerdings bringt es die beiden nun einmal mit dem Verbrechen in Zusammenhang.

yasumi schrieb:Man kann nicht Hinweise, die zu einem Täter führen, zusätzlich noch als Bestätigung für eine Täterschaft heranziehen.

Venice2009 schrieb:Ansonsten dürfte man nie jemanden aufgrund von Indizien verurteilen. Wäre das tatsächlich die bessere Alternative?

ElvisP schrieb:Mr.Crime68 schrieb:
Ich behaupte mal, diesen Brief wird es nicht geben.
Anstatt solche unseriösen Behauptungen aufzustellen, könntest du die SuFu benutzen... Wird echt immer besser hier. Erst werden die belastenden Indizien klein geredet, jetzt sind sie auf einmal frei erfunden. Lol.

Bluelle schrieb:JS an EH: I believe i would either make them completely lose their wits, get heart attacks or they would become lovers of the world. Love is a form of meditation and the ultimate weapon against your parents. My god, how I have got the dinner scene planned out.

avah schrieb:Was hat JS zu EH gesagt, wohin er mit dem Auto fährt und was er vor hat? Ich meine, JS musste doch irgendwas zu EH sagen, wohin er geht und was er macht, wenn sie keine Ahnung hatte, dass er ihre Eltern tötet. Oder ist JS einfach weggefahren und EH wusste von gar nichts? Oder wusste sie, dass er das vor hatte? Kann ich das irgendwo nachlesen, was EH dazu sagte, wie das abgelaufen ist?

In a recorded interview, Miss Haysom initially said Soerin left her in Washington, D.C., on March 30, 1985, the day her parents were killed, and said he was going to visist friends.
But later in the interview, she admitted that she knew he was going to her parents' home to confront them about their disapproval of the relationship.

avah schrieb:Was hat JS zu EH gesagt, wohin er mit dem Auto fährt und was er vor hat?

yasumi schrieb:Ich weiß ja jetzt nicht, warum du dich da so zierst und es für alle qualvoll in die Länge ziehst.

Venice2009 schrieb:Die beiden sind geflohen nachdem es eng für sie wurde und wurden nicht nach Jahren zufällig mit dem Fall in Zusammenhang gebracht.

ElvisP schrieb:Ich präzisiere: Es ist ja sogar so, dass JS zuerst alleine fluchtartig das Land verlassen hat. Seine Herzensdame ist ihm dann nachgereist. Wie passt das beispielweise zur Theorie, dass EH die (alleinige) Haupttäterin ist? Wieder so ein Puzzleteil, was weiterhilft und in der Diskussion eher unterschätzt ist (wie beispielsweise die Schnittwunde an der Hand von Super- Jensi).

In der Hoffnung, dass es hier vernünftig und ohne persönliche Anfeindungen weitergeht.

Venice2009 schrieb am 05.07.2017:Außerdem stellt sich mir immer noch die Frage, warum JS so lange bezüglich der DNA ruhig blieb. Er wartete tatsächlich bis 2009 bis die DNA untersucht wurde. Wieso versuchte er nicht schon früher eine Untersuchung durchzuboxen? Immerhin wäre das DER Beweis gewesen. Er versuchte alles mögliche, das aber nicht?

A legal pad with writing was found near the victim's body. An FBI handwriting expert said that it had Hooten's handwriting on it. [...]
Robert B. Hallett of the FBI was the state's expert. He held membership in the Mid-Atlantic Association of Forensic Scientists and the Document Examiners' Association in Washington, DC.

The government rested its case yesterday after FBI handwriting expert Robert Hallett testified that Cianciulli had filled out voter registration mail forms for some of the defendants and others.

The state called a special agent from the document section of the FBI to give evidence that the handwriting was that of Hooten. Robert B. Hallett had received a Bachelor of Arts degree from New Jersey State College in Trenton, and for the next ten years was an elementary school teacher and high school coach. During this time he taught students penmanship. He had been an agent with the FBI for fifteen years. For his first five years he was a field agent, after which he was sent to the Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory in Washington. He received three years' training in the discipline of examining questioned documents. This consisted of attending regular classes, reading prescribed books, articles and pamphlets, and taking regular tests. At the time of the trial he was on a Master's programme in forensic science at Georgetown University. He had testified in more than one hundred cases in forty different states and was a member of the MidAtlantic Association of Forensic Scientists and the Document Examiners' Association in Washington, D.C.

Entering the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1968, he served as a Special Agent and specialized in forensic sciences for documents and impressions. While there, Robert testified in a landmark case for barefoot impressions. He retired from federal service in 1989. After retirement from the FBI, he did private consulting and worked as a Forensic Scientist for the Commonwealth of Virginia State Police Forensic Lab. He retired from state service in 1999.

Agent Robert B. Hallett, a specialist in the comparison of shoe prints, testified at Fisher's Superior Court trial that Wilmington police brought a tennis shoe and two impressions on black roofing paper to the FBI laboratory in Washington. Using inked impressions from the shoe and photographic overlays of the impressions, Hallett said he was able to make the comparisons

The most controversial of the exhibits were those brought from Washington, D.C. by FBI special agent Robert Hallet. The forensic expert, who was Friday's sole witness, testified before the seven-man, five-woman jury concerning laboratory work he conducted on evidence procured by lawmen at the crime scene. [...] Hallet, who also testifed Thursday, reiterated that a tire impression made in the sand at the beach matched that of a steel- belted radial taken from a car Martinez allegedly drove the night before the murdered sales clerk was found. A photograph of a heel imprint at the death scene also matches imprints made from a boot belonging to the suspect, the special agent reported. Griffin spent more than four hours questioning Hallet's findings and his method of investigation. [...] The initial report June 24, 1982, did not link any of the evidence gathered by Galveston police to belongings of Martinez. A second report, written July 29, 1982, noted similarities between molds made from tire impressions at the sandy park with the two front tires of the car. It "was not a positive identification," Hallet insisted, but the depressions would have had to be made by a tire of the same characteristics — same size, same design,showing an alignment deflect and being under-inflated.

In Charles Fain's case, Robert B. Hallett of the FBI testified that the make of the shoe print was consistent with Fain's, and that "it was  possible  that this shoe made this impression."

Charles Irvin Fain was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder, rape, and kidnapping of a young girl. The crime occurred in Nampa, Idaho, in 1982. Fain has always maintained his innocence and DNA testing in 2001 revealed the truth of his claim. [...] Another FBI forensic examiner was called upon to testify about his comparison between shoe prints from the crime and shoes collected from Fain.

FBI Agent Hallet testified concerning the tire tread of Moss' truck matching the tire tracks found at the scene where the victim's body was found. He also worked at the FBI Laboratory during the investigated time period.

an internal FBI investigation and an investigation of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the United States Department of Justice, which found that the FBI Crime Laboratory in Washington D.C. used shoddy practices, and that some of its agents had testified falsely, committed errors in testing and issued flawed scientific reports.  Three FBI agents from the FBI Crime Laboratory, Michael Malone, William McInnis and Robert Hallet, who worked at the Laboratory at the time involved in the investigation, testified for the state in Moss' case.

The tires from defendant's car were sent to the F.B.I. lab in Washington, D.C. Robert Hallett, a special agent with expertise in tire tread examinations, testified that the tires from the defendant's car matched tire tracks from the crime scene in size and design and that at least one of the tires corresponded as far as general wear with a track found at the scene.

Robert D. Hallett, a forensic scientist who studies shoe, feet and tire impressions for the state crime lab, said the left Reebok tennis shoe worn by Dozier the day of the shooting is the shoe that left a bloody imprint on the tile floor in Haugen's kitchen.

A clear tire tread, which matched the pattern of the right rear tire of Porter's blue Ford Mustang, marked the white shorts Cooper was wearing that night, according to Robert Hallett, a forensic scientist with the state laboratory.

Robert B. Hallett qualified as an expert witness on the subject of shoe print impressions. He conducted tests on the defendant's boots.

Robert Hallett, a retired forensic impression examiner employed by the Virginia Division of Forensic Science at the time of the investigation, and qualified by the court as an expert in anatomical impressions, examined the bloody palm impression. He testified that although anatomical impressions do not produce a "positive identification" of the creator of the impression, they do permit an analysis that excludes individuals.

Yesterday, in one of the day's most moving presentations, Robert Hallett, a state forensic expert, easily fitted rubber castings made of Sztanko's feet into the tennis shoes that Dillon found. He pointed out the spot on the inside of one of the shoes where a callous had rubbed.

MissB schrieb:Interessant fand ich Ihre völlige Abkehr von ihm, in einem Brief noch vor seinem Prozess schreibt sie ihm ja wohl, dass sie ihn nicht mehr liebt und er jetzt "allein" da steht. Was hat sie wohl dazu bewogen.