Du müßtest mal erklären, warum du glaubst, ich müßte dir das erklären und nicht das Archiv. Ist es notwendig, an Bord eines entführten Flugzeugs gewesen zu sein, um dort aufgenommen zu werden?dh_awake schrieb:Und du müsstest auch erklären, was deine 911myths-Cherrypickingseite nicht macht, was Jude Larson und seine Frau im National Obituary Archiv zu suchen haben.
und dennoch kann man Fehler melden:
At the National Obituary Archive, we want every entry to be correct in every detail. We realize, however, that with tens of millions of records, some errors occur. If you find a mistake or incomplete information, please let us know how to correct the record and how you know the information you are providing is accurate. We will consider every suggested change. There is no charge for a correction.Ist diese Seite überhaupt etwas offizielles?
You may search the National Obituary Archive to verify the information we have on file by entering a name below.
Our CompanyI don´t think so.
The National Obituary Archive™
The National Obituary Archive™ was launched in October 2000 by Continental Computer Corporation, maker of the world's leading software for managing funerals and funeral homes.
Continental has repeatedly been named among the top 500 software companies in the world. Building on Continental's resources and industry relations, the National Obituary Archive™, originally known as nationalobituaryarchive.com, quickly assembled the largest collection of obituaries and death records in the world to serve as the core of an online source for anyone seeking information about the lives and deaths of friends or relatives.
Headquartered with Continental in Jonesboro, Arkansas, NOA operates as a division of the software company, which develops an array of products for the death-care industry, as well as for municipal utilities and other targeted industries. Continental Computer Corp. has raised nearly $16 million from private investors to fund the launch and development of the National Obituary Archive™ and related expansion of Continental.
Ich hatte überlegt, ob ich den Einwand vorweg nehme, oder warte, bis du ihn bringst. :D
Au contraire. Gerade letzte Woche schaute mal wieder einer im WTC1 + WTC 2 Thread vorbei. :Dkurvenkrieger schrieb:Die sind nämlich so gut wie nie hier.
Ist das jetzt wirklich dein Ernst? Ich würde mir solch Analyse zu 911myth auch wünschen...sorry for that.scarcrow schrieb:Ist diese Seite überhaupt etwas offizielles?
Was MUSS er - nichts MUSS er - genauso wie du so wenig MUSST - dumme Fragen zu stellen. Es sind Quellen...mehr nicht.geeky schrieb:Du müßtest mal erklären, warum du glaubst, ich müßte
Natalie Larson:Warum verlinkst Du eigentlich nicht Jude Larson Todesanzeige? :Dhttp://www.nationalobituaryarchive.com/obituary/obituary.asp?ObituaryID=64182639t
Hat irgendjemand behauptet, 9/11myths sei eine offizielle Seite?
"...the National Obituary Archive, a service that provides what amounts to an Everyperson's cyber-obits database (the dearly departed rendered accessible, in perpetuity, for $29.95)..."Der ganze vom New Yorker 2002:
With the exception of a presentation by Michael Putzel, a former journalist who is the vice-president of Web operations for the National Obituary Archive, a service that provides what amounts to an Everyperson’s cyber-obits database (the dearly departed rendered accessible, in perpetuity, for $29.95), the conference business sessions didn’t dwell upon the technical aspects of respectfully memorializing the dead.Von der Seite:
Jude LarsonUnd das Bild kommt von hier:
2011 - 2001
Ich halte es auch in den USA, die ja gerne als "Land der unbegrenzten Möglichkeiten" bezeichnet werden, für unmöglich, dass jemand zehn Jahre vor seiner Geburt stirbt und das auch noch so in irgendwelchen Dokumenten steht.
Hier ist eine Erklärung:
Maui News Editor in Chief David Hoff says someone purporting to be a friend of Larson's called the newspaper's office soon after the attacks to report Larson's losses. News reporters contacted Larson, who was "quite broken up and shaken but agreed to talk to us," Hoff says. With no passenger manifests available to double-check the information and no real reason to doubt Larson, the News, circulation 18,880, went with the story.
"Like any newspaper in the country, we were trying to connect [the tragedy] to our local readership any way we could," Hoff says.
The Associated Press picked up the names Jude and Natalie Larson from the News Wednesday, putting aside its own stringent guidelines for victim verification. With the dead or missing tallies reaching the thousands and the story of the attack changing by the minute, the AP put its trust in its member paper and in the fact that Curtis Larson was well-known in Maui, says Jack Stokes, the AP's media relations manager.
The Honolulu newspapers--the Star-Bulletin and the Advertiser--ran their own stories on Larson's losses. But one paper that held back was the Boston Globe. With two of the fatal flights leaving from Boston's Logan Airport, the newspaper sought information about every passenger and crew member on the airplanes, says Assistant Metro Editor Marilyn Garateix, who handled the bulk of victim coverage. Jude and Natalie Larson appeared on the AP's victim list but weren't on the passenger manifests obtained by the paper. Airlines sources were unable to confirm the two names, even on background or off the record.
"We were being very careful," Garateix says. "We didn't put anyone in the paper that we didn't have independent confirmation on." Another Globe editor called Curtis Larson and found he was expressing uncertainties about his heartbreaking tale, Garateix says. There were also inconsistencies in Larson's latest words, she says: He said someone from the airline had called to tell him of his son's death, where earlier he had said it was his ex-wife. He originally said the couple was on the American Airlines flight out of Boston, but he told the Globe they were on the United plane.
Was denn für eine Auflage ? Die Presse kann doch drucken was sie will, oder gabs da tatsächlich ne gerichtliche Anweisung wie das zu handhaben ist oder sowas in der Art ?
Das ist aber m. E. eine sehr schwache Erklärung.CarlSagan schrieb:Hier ist eine Erklärung:
Liegt vielleicht daran, dass die Leute, die sie sahen auch mitdraufgegangen sind ?
Ein US-Sender, der ausführlich über die Bruchlandung einer Asiana-Maschine berichtet hatte, hat sich mit der Bekanntgabe falscher Pilotennamen blamiert. Statt der korrekten Namen berichtete die Moderatorin eine makabere Version des Unfallhergangs.http://www.focus.de/panorama/welt/toedliche-bruchlandung-in-san-francisco-tv-sender-blamiert-sich-mit-falschen-pilotennamen_aid_1043032.html
Pech ist das allerdings nur für Dich, da damit Dein Argument, dort müssen entsprechende Dokumente vorgelegt werden, damit man aufgenommen wird, in Schutt und Asche gelegt wird. Offensichtlich kann man dort problemlos Eintragungen machen, die dann ungeprüft stehen bleiben, was bedeutet, dass diese Seite nicht als Unterstützung Deines Arguments taugt.
Pech nur, dass es die waybackmaschine gibt ... ;)
