Vor dem Zubettgehen habe ich dann doch den Teil gelesen, in dem Khalezov die "nuclear demolition" beschreibt.
you can imagine one of the Twin Towers on top of this cavity with its lowest underground floor slightly touching the upper sphere of the overheated cavity (the Twin Towers’ lowest underground foundations were 27 meters below the Earth’ surface). That was the original demolition idea.
Such a development would cause the Tower to lose its foundations completely and to be “sucked” into the cavity, and, in the same time – to quickly melt down. The temperature of the nuclear explosion is so high, that it would cause both steel and concrete alike to melt down almost immediately. In about 20-30 seconds or so the entire 415 meters long Tower was supposed to neatly immerse into the 100 meters cavity; because, in the same time the Tower would be completely molten.
The effect should look as if you heat a small metal cup and place into it vertically a long bar of ice-cream.
Even if that bar of ice-cream is five times longer than the cup, it will quickly melt down and neatly fit into the cup, so that no ice-cream “debris” would spill around the cup. The idea was that the entire Tower would nicely fit into its own footprint – so that no debris would fall outside the footprint, and no surroundings would be damaged by any debris due to the presumable absence of any debris.
Man zündet also die Bombe, diese bläst eine mehr oder wenige runde "Höhle" von 100 Metern im Durchmesser, "berührt" das Untergeschoss des jeweiligen WTC Towers, der daraufhin in die Höhlung hinein "kollabiert" und gleichzeitig komplett schmilzt, wie ein Eis in einer heißen Metalltasse. Umliegende Gebäude sollen dabei dann nicht beschädigt werden.
Ich komme gerade aus dem Lachen nicht mehr heraus. Der Typ hat doch Lack gesoffen oder Pilze geraucht oder wasweissich.
Interalia schrieb:Lies 'mal in Ruhe den Beitrag um 03:01, sowie:
