ist aber genau die, auf die sich Putin beruftDesaix schrieb:Lies bitte noch einmal den Pakt durch. Du bist immer noch auf deiner Nichtangriffspakt-Phase drin.
Russland muss aber natürlich sofort alles richtig machen...tztztzcanales schrieb:wenn man bedenkt wie das noch vor 50 oder vor 100 Jahren aussah.
ganz großes aua
Jetzt halte mal die Luft an, Russland ist nur immer weiter an seinen Grenzen vorgerückt über hunderte von Jahren, sie haben die Gebiete nur nicht wieder abgegeben.
Russland vereinigt seit Jahrhunderten um die 100 Völker, und integriert sie voll in die Gemeinschaft. Das hat nicht mal Amerika bis heute richtig geschafft, wenn man dort die immer wieder aufbegehrenden Schwarzen und Südamerikaner ansieht.
Du disqualifizierst dich doch mit solchen Aussagen selbst. Ich verteidige doch auch nicht die Appeasementpolitik. Warum sollte man den Pakt verteidigen? Und Deutschland gehörte damals nicht zum Westen, sondern verfolgte einen Sonderweg.Rechtversteher schrieb:Den Hitlerstalinpakt haben die Deutschen auch abgeschlossen, heute sind sind die Deutschen mit der Eu schon wieder ein Stück weiter, ich verstehe Putin. Man hat doch einfach ein weiteres Vordringens Deutschlands verhindern wollen.
Also war Sibirien immer russisch? Kaukasus? Innerasien? Ja oder nein?
Alaska wurde verkauft und Ostblock ist schwierig zu sagen, da die Sowjetunion am Zerfallen war. Wie hätte man da gross kämpfen können?
Das ist nicht anderes als ein Anwort auf die Blockbildung des Westens ist doch klar das Putin jetzt Verbündete sucht und diese Staaten bei ihm um Schutz bitten. Sie sehen doch auch alle, was der Westen gerade im Nahen Osten macht.
Im September 2013 kündigten die Präsidenten Armeniens und Russlands an, dass der Kaukasusstaat der Zollunion und in Folge auch der Eurasischen Union beitreten werde.[59] Auch Syrien erklärte die Absicht, der Zollunion beitreten zu wollenist mir beim Durchlesen gerade aufgefallen...Syrien will in die Eurasische...Ukraine in die europäische Union
Ich habe die Blockbildung nicht mal kritisiert, sondern sagte bloss, dass Russland die Länder teilweise alimentiert. Oder wo wäre Weissrussland ohne Russland?
Vladimir Putin: I thought for a long while about whether to answer this question at all. It is not a question that would fit in a blitz Q&A section. This is a philosophical question. I’ll read it out. This question was asked by Yekaterina Shcherbonos from St Petersburg: “I’m asking you as a politician but I’d like to hear your personal rather than political opinion. What is the Russian people to you? By virtue of your position you’ve probably been to all countries of the world. You’ve seen a tremendous number of nations and ethnic groups and learned about their cultural traditions, national habits, cuisine and arts. In this context I’d like to ask you: In your opinion, what does it mean to be Russian? What do you think about their pluses and minuses, their weaknesses and strengths?”http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20796
Well, some specialists believe that the people as a community do not have specific features, that only individuals have them. I find it hard to accept this position because if people are using the same language, live in a common state, on a common territory with a certain climate, if they have common cultural values and history, they are bound to have some common features.
As for our people, our country, like a magnet, has attracted representatives of different ethnic groups, nations and nationalities. Incidentally, this has become the backbone not only for our common cultural code but also a very powerful genetic code, because genes have been exchanged during all these centuries and even millennia as a result of mixed marriages.
And this genetic code of ours is probably, and in fact almost certainly, one of our main competitive advantages in today’s world. This code is very flexible and enduring. We don’t even feel it but it is certainly there.
So what are our particular features? We do have them, of course, and I think they rely on values. It seems to me that the Russian person or, on a broader scale, a person of the Russian world, primarily thinks about his or her highest moral designation, some highest moral truths. This is why the Russian person, or a person of the Russian world, does not concentrate on his or her own precious personality…
Of course, in everyday life we all think about how to live a wealthier and better life, to be healthier and help our family, but these are still not the main values. Our people open themselves outward. Western values are different and are focused on one’s inner self. Personal success is the yardstick of success in life and this is acknowledged by society. The more successful a man is, the better he is.
This is not enough for us in this country. Even very rich people say: “Okay, I’ve made millions and billions, so what next?” At any rate, everything is directed outward, and oriented toward society. I think only our people could have come up with the famous saying: “Meeting your death is no fear when you have got people round you.” How come? Death is horrible, isn’t it? But no, it appears it may be beautiful if it serves the people: death for one’s friends, one’s people or for the homeland, to use a modern word.
These are the deep roots of our patriotism. They explain mass heroism during armed conflicts and wars and even sacrifice in peacetime. Hence there is a feeling of fellowship and family values. Of course, we are less pragmatic, less calculating than representatives of other peoples, and we have bigger hearts. Maybe this is a reflection of the grandeur of our country and its boundless expanses. Our people have a more generous spirit.
I don’t want to offend anyone by saying this. Many peoples have their own advantages but this is certainly ours. An intensive genetic, informational and cultural exchange is going on in the modern world. There is no doubt that other peoples have precious and useful things that we can borrow, but we have relied for centuries on our own values, which have never let us down and will stand us in good stead in the future.
Die Gründe spielen doch keine Rolle. Sie haben Territorium abgegeben, ohne das es Menschen das Leben gekostet hat, das war zumindest bei Gorbatschow der entscheidende Grund das es kein Blutvergießen gibt. Aber so etwas vergesst ihr alle.
des doch nen guter Spruch find ichsarasvati23 schrieb:I don’t want to offend anyone by saying this. Many peoples have their own advantages but this is certainly ours. An intensive genetic, informational and cultural exchange is going on in the modern world. There is no doubt that other peoples have precious and useful things that we can borrow, but we have relied for centuries on our own values, which have never let us down and will stand us in good stead in the future.
