Oscar Pistorius, das Model, der Valentinstag und das war dann Notwehr

Photographer73 schrieb:Man könnte diese ganze Aussage auch der Version von OP zuordnen, wenn nicht die BEIDEN Stimmen wären. Die kann Roux nicht wegdiskutieren, bei allem anderen geht es um Sekunden, das könnte man so oder so sehen.

Kai Feldhaus‏@KaiFeldhaus·2 Min.
Pause. Hektische Betriebsamkeit unter den Anwälten. Nur #OscarPistorius sitzt wie versteinert in seiner Bank.

Comtesse schrieb:Ich bin jetzt mal Roux: Die 2. Stimme könnte auch von sonstwo und sonstwem gekommen sein, z.B. von einem Nachbarn, der durch die 1. Stimme geweckt wurde und etwas zu ihr rüberrief ("Was ist los da? Brauchen Sie Hilfe? Ich hab die Polizei gerufen!...")

Auf dem Weg zur Bank seiner Anwälte schüttelt #OscarPistorius die Hände der Damen der ANC Womens League. NB: Sie fordern lebenslang für ihn.

On Oscar Pistorius, Stumps, Partiality and Science

Well I do find much to admire about OP. This includes his remarkable triumph over his disability, and unfair attempts to permaban him from runnuig against able-bodied runners. His public self-effacing, humorous personna was wonderful.

His story is one of great triumph over much adversity. Even how some 6 years ago, the Paralympic Committee ruled that he has an unfair advantage over “normal” runners based on a German professor of biomechanics videotaping and analysis. He was permabanned from running against normal runners. Oscar then got American biophysicists to prove that while the spring energy in his carbon blades gives him a slight advantage on the straightaway, he has significant disadvantage at the start and on the turns. So over all, he still has a disadvantage vs able runners. And his permaban was lifted when he contested it with the Court of Arbitration in Sport.

It’s tragic that Oscar may never get the chance—with improved blades or further training or IMO finding out about his hidden medical issues, he might have become “the world’s fastest human”— despite his disability.

But far more tragic is the taking of a life. A young lovely life, but any life is precious.

I report things here because all or most here have not read his autobio or have the background I have, and so I share. The problem is the more one knows about science or OP’s autobio, the more problematic is his BH affidavit, and the current absurdities from his DT. This is not “impartiality”, rather it is having certain knowledge—including his own revelations in his book.

But for the record, he is highly mobile on his stumps, and he "beat the competition" up till the age of 12 while running only on his stumps

Just one more improbability I share with you now. His BH affidavit includes this: “…I put on my prosthetic legs, ran back to the bathroom and tried to kick the toilet door open. I think I must then have turned on the lights…”

But in his book, Blade Runner, he details how his regular prosthetics (not his carbon fiber J-blades he runs on) are made of fiberglass and break easily.

My point is the more you know…

Conclusion I share: it is to me highly improbable that he would try to kick the door open because he knew his prosthetics would likely immediately break. .

But as with all else, still possible.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=236783&page=71