mvb
Diskussionsleiter
Profil anzeigen
Private Nachricht
Link kopieren
Lesezeichen setzen
dabei seit 2005
Profil anzeigen
Private Nachricht
Link kopieren
Lesezeichen setzen
WMD at the WTC
25.01.2007 um 13:02QUOTE:Poly
_____________________________________________
Kannst mir dasendlich
mal erklären?
_____________________________________________
Hab ichschon
längst!
Und von wegen"Verstrahlt":
_________________________________________________________________
Sept. 12, 2006
-- According to sources who worked with the Federal EmergencyManagement Agency (FEMA)
at Ground Zero on and after 911, residents of southernManhattan and rescue and clean-up
workers involved in the recovery operations at thesite of the former World Trade Center
are experiencing an unusually high rate ofnon-Hodgkin lymphoma -- a cancer that is
common among individuals who have beenexposed to extremely high levels of ionizing
radiation, such as that from nuclearblasts and major nuclear reactor leaks. In
addition to the respiratory problemsamong rescue workers at Ground Zero who breathed
toxic "pulverized" concrete and otherdebris into their lungs, the radiation cancer is of
extreme interest to researcherswho suspect that the World Trade Center towers and
Building 7 were brought down withthe help of high energy releases. WMR spoke to a number
of individuals who were atGround Zero on 911 who are now experiencing symptoms resulting
from severe damage totheir immune systems -- a condition that is common among those
exposed to high levelsof radiation.
Sources close to FEMA in New York confirmed
to WMR that thelymphoma cases are believed to be the result of a release of extremely
high levels ofradiation from a series of nuclear events on the morning of 911. They
believe thatexplains the reason for the "pulverization" of concrete, molten metals,
pyroclasticsurges and fallout, and other anomalies resulting from the catastrophe. It
was alsopointed out that some vehicles parked on the west side of the World Trade Center
were"fused" on the sides facing the towers -- the doors being melted into the body
frames.Other cars parked nearby were not similarly affected. There is also evidenceof
explosions and fires on top of the Woolworth Building, three blocks away from theWorld
Trade Center, during the attack on the towers.
FEMA officials fromWashington,
DC were quick to ban any unofficial photography in southern Manhattan inthe weeks
following 911. Any photographers who had not received prior permission fromFEMA to be in
southern Manhattan found their photographic and filming equipmentconfiscated by the
government.
_______________________________________________________________
http://www.mail-archive.com/cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com/msg05561.html
____________________________________________________________
To date, 75recovery
workers on or around what is now known as "the Pile"—the rubble that remainedafter the
World Trade Center towers collapsed on the morning of September 11,2001—have been
diagnosed with blood cell cancers that a half-dozen top doctors andepidemiologists have
confirmed as having been likely caused by that exposure.
Those 75 cases have
come to light in joint-action lawsuits filed against New YorkCity on behalf of at least
8,500 recovery workers who suffer from various forms oflung illnesses and respiratory
diseases—and suggest a pattern too distinct to ignore.While some cancers take years,
if not decades, to develop, the blood cancers inotherwise healthy and young individuals
represent a pattern that experts believe willlikely prove to be more than
circumstantial. The suits seek to prove that these 8,500workers—approximately 20 percent
of the total estimated recovery force that clearedthe rubble from ground zero—all suffer
from the debilitating effects of thoseevents.
.......
[Boston
University's Dr. David] Ozonoff echoes all fiveof his colleagues when he draws parallels
between the aftermath of 9-11 and that ofanother massive exposure: the atomic-bombs
dropped on Japan. Bomb survivorsexperienced excessive spikes in leukemia rates within
the first five years, asurprising discovery for epidemiologists in the mid 20th century.
While this outbreakresulted from radiation, both it and 9-11 involved a sudden and
intense blast ofcarcinogens. For bomb survivors, leukemia appeared first, followed by
breast and lungcancer. "That could happen with 9-11," says [Jonathan] Samet, the Johns
Hopkinsepidemiology department chair. "It might be what we're seeingtoday."
________________________________________________________________
http://www.media-criticism.com/Total44Info_Wtc_Cancer_Hiroshima.html (Archiv-Version vom 11.10.2007)
____________________________________________________________
"Thosenumbers seem
quite outrageous," is how Hesdorffer puts it. Now at Johns Hopkins,Hesdorffer directed
until last year the tumor immunotherapy program at ColumbiaUniversity Medical Center,
where he treated two recovery workers who got cancerpost–9-11. He notes that the
average healthy adult person has a 20 percent risk ofhaving cancer over a lifetime.
Calculate that risk over five years—the time frame fromthe events of 9-11 until
today—and it drops to about 1 percent. Yet 5 percent of thesuits' workers—1 percent of
the overall worker population—have already been diagnosedwith malignancies. And these
patients don't include the thousands whose illnesses haveyet to be recorded because they
aren't participating in the lawsuits or in the WorldTrade Center medical-monitoring
programs.
What the experts find mosttelling are the types of cancer now
emerging. They say the blood cancer cases seem toodisproportionate to be random. Two
percent of these workers have been diagnosed withwhat amounts to related diseases, none
of which fall into the "high-frequency"category, which includes prostate cancer. One
out of 9,000 people nationwide getslymphoma a year; for myeloma, it's one out of 30,000.
By contrast, the 75 blood cancerpatients translate into several dozen new cases a
year.
"That's not justa fluke," says Ozonoff, who studies cancer clusters
and toxic waste sites.
____________________________________________________________
http://www.media-criticism.com/radiation_NYC_Village_Voice_11_28.html
Und so
weiter und sofort.... das ist erst der Anfang, wie bereist erwähnt, die meisten
Spätfolgen kommenerst noch, erschreckend genug das es jetzt schon so viele sind. Denk
mal an Japan, dagibt es sogar nach 50 jahren noch spätfolgen.
mfg
_____________________________________________
Kannst mir dasendlich
mal erklären?
_____________________________________________
Hab ichschon
längst!
Und von wegen"Verstrahlt":
_________________________________________________________________
Sept. 12, 2006
-- According to sources who worked with the Federal EmergencyManagement Agency (FEMA)
at Ground Zero on and after 911, residents of southernManhattan and rescue and clean-up
workers involved in the recovery operations at thesite of the former World Trade Center
are experiencing an unusually high rate ofnon-Hodgkin lymphoma -- a cancer that is
common among individuals who have beenexposed to extremely high levels of ionizing
radiation, such as that from nuclearblasts and major nuclear reactor leaks. In
addition to the respiratory problemsamong rescue workers at Ground Zero who breathed
toxic "pulverized" concrete and otherdebris into their lungs, the radiation cancer is of
extreme interest to researcherswho suspect that the World Trade Center towers and
Building 7 were brought down withthe help of high energy releases. WMR spoke to a number
of individuals who were atGround Zero on 911 who are now experiencing symptoms resulting
from severe damage totheir immune systems -- a condition that is common among those
exposed to high levelsof radiation.
Sources close to FEMA in New York confirmed
to WMR that thelymphoma cases are believed to be the result of a release of extremely
high levels ofradiation from a series of nuclear events on the morning of 911. They
believe thatexplains the reason for the "pulverization" of concrete, molten metals,
pyroclasticsurges and fallout, and other anomalies resulting from the catastrophe. It
was alsopointed out that some vehicles parked on the west side of the World Trade Center
were"fused" on the sides facing the towers -- the doors being melted into the body
frames.Other cars parked nearby were not similarly affected. There is also evidenceof
explosions and fires on top of the Woolworth Building, three blocks away from theWorld
Trade Center, during the attack on the towers.
FEMA officials fromWashington,
DC were quick to ban any unofficial photography in southern Manhattan inthe weeks
following 911. Any photographers who had not received prior permission fromFEMA to be in
southern Manhattan found their photographic and filming equipmentconfiscated by the
government.
_______________________________________________________________
http://www.mail-archive.com/cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com/msg05561.html
____________________________________________________________
To date, 75recovery
workers on or around what is now known as "the Pile"—the rubble that remainedafter the
World Trade Center towers collapsed on the morning of September 11,2001—have been
diagnosed with blood cell cancers that a half-dozen top doctors andepidemiologists have
confirmed as having been likely caused by that exposure.
Those 75 cases have
come to light in joint-action lawsuits filed against New YorkCity on behalf of at least
8,500 recovery workers who suffer from various forms oflung illnesses and respiratory
diseases—and suggest a pattern too distinct to ignore.While some cancers take years,
if not decades, to develop, the blood cancers inotherwise healthy and young individuals
represent a pattern that experts believe willlikely prove to be more than
circumstantial. The suits seek to prove that these 8,500workers—approximately 20 percent
of the total estimated recovery force that clearedthe rubble from ground zero—all suffer
from the debilitating effects of thoseevents.
.......
[Boston
University's Dr. David] Ozonoff echoes all fiveof his colleagues when he draws parallels
between the aftermath of 9-11 and that ofanother massive exposure: the atomic-bombs
dropped on Japan. Bomb survivorsexperienced excessive spikes in leukemia rates within
the first five years, asurprising discovery for epidemiologists in the mid 20th century.
While this outbreakresulted from radiation, both it and 9-11 involved a sudden and
intense blast ofcarcinogens. For bomb survivors, leukemia appeared first, followed by
breast and lungcancer. "That could happen with 9-11," says [Jonathan] Samet, the Johns
Hopkinsepidemiology department chair. "It might be what we're seeingtoday."
________________________________________________________________
http://www.media-criticism.com/Total44Info_Wtc_Cancer_Hiroshima.html (Archiv-Version vom 11.10.2007)
____________________________________________________________
"Thosenumbers seem
quite outrageous," is how Hesdorffer puts it. Now at Johns Hopkins,Hesdorffer directed
until last year the tumor immunotherapy program at ColumbiaUniversity Medical Center,
where he treated two recovery workers who got cancerpost–9-11. He notes that the
average healthy adult person has a 20 percent risk ofhaving cancer over a lifetime.
Calculate that risk over five years—the time frame fromthe events of 9-11 until
today—and it drops to about 1 percent. Yet 5 percent of thesuits' workers—1 percent of
the overall worker population—have already been diagnosedwith malignancies. And these
patients don't include the thousands whose illnesses haveyet to be recorded because they
aren't participating in the lawsuits or in the WorldTrade Center medical-monitoring
programs.
What the experts find mosttelling are the types of cancer now
emerging. They say the blood cancer cases seem toodisproportionate to be random. Two
percent of these workers have been diagnosed withwhat amounts to related diseases, none
of which fall into the "high-frequency"category, which includes prostate cancer. One
out of 9,000 people nationwide getslymphoma a year; for myeloma, it's one out of 30,000.
By contrast, the 75 blood cancerpatients translate into several dozen new cases a
year.
"That's not justa fluke," says Ozonoff, who studies cancer clusters
and toxic waste sites.
____________________________________________________________
Und so
weiter und sofort.... das ist erst der Anfang, wie bereist erwähnt, die meisten
Spätfolgen kommenerst noch, erschreckend genug das es jetzt schon so viele sind. Denk
mal an Japan, dagibt es sogar nach 50 jahren noch spätfolgen.
mfg
