Desmocorse schrieb:Und nur weil zur selben Zeit, Leute irgendwelche Flugzeuge als Ufos meldeten,
hat das mit den Radardaten absolut nichts zu tun !
Aber claro hat das damit zu tun
In a recent interview, Major General De Brouwer summarized his reflections on this complex case:
"What impressed me the most were the witnesses, some of whom I know personally and convinced me that, in fact, something was going on. These were credible people and they told clearly what they saw.
"We always look for possibilities which can cause errors in the radar systems. We can not exclude that there was electromagnetic interference, but of course we can not exclude the possibility that there were objects in the air. On at least one occasion there was a correlation between the radar contacts of one ground radar and one F-16 fighter. This weakens the theory that all radar contacts were caused by electromagnetic interference. If we add all the possibilities, the question is still open, so there is no final answer."
Das sagt Brouver sogar selbst.
Luminarah schrieb:Man sollte eigentlich eher begründen ,was an diesem Buch unwissenschaftlich war beziehungsweise wo genau man seine These
Groucho schrieb:(@Desmocorse: Yo, der war gut, was? :D )
Baja schrieb:Wenn Du Bücher aufgrund ihrer Thematik meidest, kannst Du nicht wissen was dort geschrieben steht.
