@Celladoor Das sind nur einige Auszüge aus den Blogs oder Foren in denen ich entweder mitlese oder mit diskutiere. Dort wurden schon sehr früh Zweifel laut, ob die Rettungsflotilla an der richtigen Stelle sucht. Kurz nacheinander wurde zweimal die Suchregion geändert. Und alles das weil die Grundregel wissenschaftlicher Arbeit kategorisch von INMARSAT negiert wurde.
Hier die geforderten Quellen...
"Inmarsat has pulled off the hoax of the century by directing the search for MH 370 to the Indian Ocean. The probability of finding the plane in the present search area is no higher than for any other randomly selected area in the Indian Ocean.
Inmarsat is guilty of some combination of scientific incompetence and fraud...."
Quelle:
http://marvinsthinking.blogspot.de/2014/04/mh370-is-not-lost-in-indian-ocean.html "They have not done any calculations my friend. The whole thing is a hoax. Too sad so many scientists have fallen in the obvious trap. You need the signal LIVE to make such calculations. You need an oscilloscope or other device to record the signal's frequency/wavelength etc LIVE to do such calculations.None of the commercial satellites has such equipment on board. The inmarsat satellites only recorded the event, the data the signal carried in the form of text or computer language.
This is a huge HOAX"
Quelle:
http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2014/03/how-did-inmarsat-really-find-flight.html?showComment=1396948318238#c8195169084612475366 "I assert here that the assertion by Inmarsat is wrong. I do not assert that the aircraft definitely took a northerly route. However, I present evidence hereunder that a northerly route cannot be excluded on the basis of the satellite data, and that a northerly track remains viable in terms of what the satellite data can tell us."
Quelle:
http://www.duncansteel.com/archives/507 (Archiv-Version vom 05.04.2014)
