Bruno Borges
09.04.2017 um 03:11Auf Scienceblogs in den Kommentaren kann man scheinbar die komplette erste Übersetzung lesen. Die hier schon ein paar mal aufgefasst wurden, aber ich denke da fehlt noch einiges und es einmal kompakt darzustellen schadet auch nicht
Die Blätter die übersetzt wurden
Original anzeigen (1,1 MB) und Original anzeigen (1,5 MB)
Also der Allgemeine Titel soll wohl sein "Die Theorie der Absorption des Wissens" fade übersetzt..
Und diese zwei Exemplare weisen den Inhalt auf:
1) THE HARD WAY For thousands of years the human being has been trying to find answers to questions like “what is the meaning of life”? The philosophy that seems to have begun with Tales of Miletus in the middle of 700 BC seems to find traces of unanswered questions. The deep search for absolute truth comes from philosophy, and when we talk about easy or difficult paths we are referring to this type of theorem. It’s easy to accept what you’ve been taught since childhood is wrong. It is difficult when you are an adult to understand that you have been taught wrongly since you suspected that you were correct. In other words, if you fit in with someone whose middle stimuli determined a certain behavior to you, making you at the mercy of beliefs already provided and well established in dogmas and rituals, with a concentrated mass of people in it; Or allowing you to conform, accepting the concept of happiness and meaning of life embedded in the media and society, then clearly you are part of the easy path to the quest for absolute truth. Perhaps it fits into the second option, that is, the one who suspected every set of beliefs that was rooted to him, then he has everything to be a researcher of truthfulness in the things around him, entering a more complicated path, in which a minority takes risks or faces bravely …
2) … Since normality presents itself as a rectilinear and uniform pattern, and therefore is the cause of the action of the masses, then those of the easy way are more to it than those of the difficult road. Consequently the latter tend to be more willing to go astray, going to the extremity of both lucidity and insanity. However, remember that the so-called “normal” here does not mean exactly “positive”, but rather alludes to the way people interpret around what is to act acceptably in a society. In addition, this habitual way of seeing normality is tamed to the method instilled by the media and other common sense participles to how you should manifest in the social environment. In addition, it is convenient to argue the possibility of those who follow the straight standard of normality are added to those of the easy way, which in turn results in alienation. However, make it clear that it is not always generalized and can be otherwise productive and beneficial. It is pertinent to argue first of all that the extremities are much more plausible to take place – regardless of the paths to be followed, in their maxims – in the “continuums.” Well, they are the extreme point of the two tracks, so it is certainly by them that one of the two peaks can be reached represented in the figure of this …
Die Blätter die übersetzt wurden
Original anzeigen (1,1 MB) und Original anzeigen (1,5 MB)
Also der Allgemeine Titel soll wohl sein "Die Theorie der Absorption des Wissens" fade übersetzt..
Und diese zwei Exemplare weisen den Inhalt auf:
1) THE HARD WAY For thousands of years the human being has been trying to find answers to questions like “what is the meaning of life”? The philosophy that seems to have begun with Tales of Miletus in the middle of 700 BC seems to find traces of unanswered questions. The deep search for absolute truth comes from philosophy, and when we talk about easy or difficult paths we are referring to this type of theorem. It’s easy to accept what you’ve been taught since childhood is wrong. It is difficult when you are an adult to understand that you have been taught wrongly since you suspected that you were correct. In other words, if you fit in with someone whose middle stimuli determined a certain behavior to you, making you at the mercy of beliefs already provided and well established in dogmas and rituals, with a concentrated mass of people in it; Or allowing you to conform, accepting the concept of happiness and meaning of life embedded in the media and society, then clearly you are part of the easy path to the quest for absolute truth. Perhaps it fits into the second option, that is, the one who suspected every set of beliefs that was rooted to him, then he has everything to be a researcher of truthfulness in the things around him, entering a more complicated path, in which a minority takes risks or faces bravely …
2) … Since normality presents itself as a rectilinear and uniform pattern, and therefore is the cause of the action of the masses, then those of the easy way are more to it than those of the difficult road. Consequently the latter tend to be more willing to go astray, going to the extremity of both lucidity and insanity. However, remember that the so-called “normal” here does not mean exactly “positive”, but rather alludes to the way people interpret around what is to act acceptably in a society. In addition, this habitual way of seeing normality is tamed to the method instilled by the media and other common sense participles to how you should manifest in the social environment. In addition, it is convenient to argue the possibility of those who follow the straight standard of normality are added to those of the easy way, which in turn results in alienation. However, make it clear that it is not always generalized and can be otherwise productive and beneficial. It is pertinent to argue first of all that the extremities are much more plausible to take place – regardless of the paths to be followed, in their maxims – in the “continuums.” Well, they are the extreme point of the two tracks, so it is certainly by them that one of the two peaks can be reached represented in the figure of this …