@ jojo: Muß IMO jeder selbst entscheiden, in wie weit man den löchrigen Erklärungen des NIST glauben schenken will, die stets mit unwissenschaftlicher Methodik glänzen, deren Aufgabengebiet klar umrissen war - wer das nicht glaubt, hier die Originalformulierung der Aufgabe:
NIST
Bestimmen, warum und wie die Gebäude WTC 1 und WTC 2 zusammenstürzen
konnten auf Grund des Einschlags der Flugzeuge und warum und wie Gebäude
Nummer 7. kollabierteund welche der Bush-Adminastration untersteht, und von Bush selbst ins Leben gerufen wurde.
On Oct. 1, 2002, President Bush signed the National Construction Safety Team Act (NCST) into law, establishing NIST as the lead agency to investigate building failures. Providing authorities modeled after those of the National Transportation Safety Board, the NCST applies to the ongoing NIST WTC investigation.
The content of these documents will also be less surprising insofar as readers are aware of the Bush administration's record with regard to science. Already in 2003, the editor of "Science" spoke of growing evidence that the Bush administration has undermined the scientific integrity at federal agencies by "invad[ing] areas once immune to this kind of manipulation." Later that year, the minority staff of the House Committee on Government Reform published a document entitled "Politics and Science in the Bush Administration." It described "numerous instances where the Administration has manipulated the scientific process and distorted or suppressed scientific findings." In 2004, a statement accusing the Bush administration of engaging in "distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends" was signed by 62 renowned scientists; by December 2006, this statement had been signed by over 10,000 scientists, including 52 Nobel Laureates and 63 recipients of the National Medal of Science. If agencies of the Bush administration would produced flawed scientific analyses to promote the administration's agend on issues such as the environment and Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, as the studies show, then it would hardly be surprising that a Bush administration agency would produce a scientifically flawed report to rebut evidence that this administration was responsible for treason and mass murder.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/17297
