Der Fall "Luka Magnotta"
20.06.2012 um 12:52Bitte selber übersetzen, habe gerade keine Zeit dafür. Habe es von Tumblr.
LUKA MAGNOTTA INNOCENT? WAS HE SET UP?
This Luka Magnotta case draw my attention from the very beginning. Not that I would be interested in murder cases, it’s not my cup of tea at all, but the fact that Luka was gay, a porn actor, quite young, all of that was interesting enough to me to suck me in. So I followed this case a lot recently.
All of this current media hysteria makes my eyes roll 360 when I see masses of people already proclaiming Luka guilty as charged and nobody seems to at least question a little bit if Luka really was a murderer or not. I think at least two strong evidences show he actually couldn’t be the killer. Or at least I’m cofused by these two facts quite a lot:
1.) Luka’s face absent in the videos. NO actual FACE of Luka Magnotta can be seen in any of supposedly his infamous videos (two kittens killing videos and 1 lunatic 1 icepick one). Although I haven’t seen any of the three videos directly, I’ve only seen caps which you can find all over the web (not only the censored ones, also the graphic ones). All you can see in the caps is some guy with a hood filmed sometimes from the side who could maybe be Luka, but could easily be anybody else as well. There’s is no clear picture where Luka’s face would be visible enough, so you could be sure it’s really him.
There was no Luka in the video: If Luka really was the killer filming himself, why did he film himself in such a bad quality that we can’t even tell who the killer really is? If he really wanted to show the world he killed the Asian guy, why didn’t he show his own face in the video?? Why is the video edited so strongly? The only reasonable explanation in my opinion is: because there was no Luka in the video. Because someone else wanted to make it look like it was him.
2.) Mattress patterns don’t match. Another fact which nobody really seems to care about, but it seems really crucial, is the pattern of the mattress on which murder supposedly took place. The pattern on the mattress found by the police DOES NOT MATCH to the one in the killing video. You can see it here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ew21K3J3JOQ Doesn’t that seem to be just like very important to anyone???
These facts lead me to conclusion that Luka’s videos could have in fact been setups. It is obvious from the web that Luka had enough haters even enemies. Why couldn’t somebody for example who knew him well try to set him up something like this? Or a couple of people? My theory is, that the murder of Jun Lin was preformed and filmed by a third person and then it was made to look like it was done by Luka. We must not forget that the only links between Luka and the incriminating videos actually are the video descriptions ONLY. If Magnotta’s name wasn’t mentioned in the video descriptions, nobody would ever talk about Luka as the killer.
Besides that the first reaction of Canadian police, when the 1 lunatic video was reported to them, was: why would anyone incriminate himself by killing somebody and then send the evidence to the police? They were right. Nobody would do that except a lunatic. So Luka either was a lunatic, or he’s a victim of a lunatic who set him up.
Last but not least Luka seemed to have had absolutely no reason to do such a crime. He loved life too much, he lived it to the fullest, he traveled around the whole world, why would he murder someone and thus condemn himself in life in prison? It just doesn’t fit to his character.
LUKA MAGNOTTA INNOCENT? WAS HE SET UP?
This Luka Magnotta case draw my attention from the very beginning. Not that I would be interested in murder cases, it’s not my cup of tea at all, but the fact that Luka was gay, a porn actor, quite young, all of that was interesting enough to me to suck me in. So I followed this case a lot recently.
All of this current media hysteria makes my eyes roll 360 when I see masses of people already proclaiming Luka guilty as charged and nobody seems to at least question a little bit if Luka really was a murderer or not. I think at least two strong evidences show he actually couldn’t be the killer. Or at least I’m cofused by these two facts quite a lot:
1.) Luka’s face absent in the videos. NO actual FACE of Luka Magnotta can be seen in any of supposedly his infamous videos (two kittens killing videos and 1 lunatic 1 icepick one). Although I haven’t seen any of the three videos directly, I’ve only seen caps which you can find all over the web (not only the censored ones, also the graphic ones). All you can see in the caps is some guy with a hood filmed sometimes from the side who could maybe be Luka, but could easily be anybody else as well. There’s is no clear picture where Luka’s face would be visible enough, so you could be sure it’s really him.
There was no Luka in the video: If Luka really was the killer filming himself, why did he film himself in such a bad quality that we can’t even tell who the killer really is? If he really wanted to show the world he killed the Asian guy, why didn’t he show his own face in the video?? Why is the video edited so strongly? The only reasonable explanation in my opinion is: because there was no Luka in the video. Because someone else wanted to make it look like it was him.
2.) Mattress patterns don’t match. Another fact which nobody really seems to care about, but it seems really crucial, is the pattern of the mattress on which murder supposedly took place. The pattern on the mattress found by the police DOES NOT MATCH to the one in the killing video. You can see it here:
These facts lead me to conclusion that Luka’s videos could have in fact been setups. It is obvious from the web that Luka had enough haters even enemies. Why couldn’t somebody for example who knew him well try to set him up something like this? Or a couple of people? My theory is, that the murder of Jun Lin was preformed and filmed by a third person and then it was made to look like it was done by Luka. We must not forget that the only links between Luka and the incriminating videos actually are the video descriptions ONLY. If Magnotta’s name wasn’t mentioned in the video descriptions, nobody would ever talk about Luka as the killer.
Besides that the first reaction of Canadian police, when the 1 lunatic video was reported to them, was: why would anyone incriminate himself by killing somebody and then send the evidence to the police? They were right. Nobody would do that except a lunatic. So Luka either was a lunatic, or he’s a victim of a lunatic who set him up.
Last but not least Luka seemed to have had absolutely no reason to do such a crime. He loved life too much, he lived it to the fullest, he traveled around the whole world, why would he murder someone and thus condemn himself in life in prison? It just doesn’t fit to his character.