HIER HABE ICH NOCH EINEN BRIEF VON PEARL, DEN SIE AN UNS ALLE GESCHRIEBEN HAT UM DIE SACHE MIT DIESEM PETER ABZUKLÄREN. SIE ERKLÄRT SICH DARIN AUCH WARUM SIE AN EINEN HOAX GLAUBT UND DASS SIE KEINE BÖSEN ABSICHTEN UNTERHÄLT. SIE SAGT, DASS SIE VON DIESER ARBEIT NICHT LEBEN KÖNNTE UND AUF DAS EINKOMMEN IHRES MANNES ANGEWIESEN IST UND NICHT - WIE EINIGE BEHAUPTEN - DIE BELIEVER HINHÄLT UM DAMIT GELD ZU VERDIENEN.
Pearljr Pearljr
This week's video is a written statement. Please read it here: twitlonger.com/show/fnts84 Read it until the end because something interesting
5 Feb
Well, PeterPanPyt (PPPYT) has some serious longevity! Many have inquired why, after some have vigorously stated that PeterPanPyt is not Michael Joe Jackson, would I start the "Is PPPYT Michael" all over again?
Considering the world has been told Michael Jackson has died, I'm not really interested in finding Michael because I feel if he’s alive and wants to talk to me, he would find a way; therefore with the exception of 1 percent of our videos, our video "A Michael Jackson Sighting Confirmed?" is practically the ONLY other video I’ve made regarding some sort of Michael sighting or impersonator. That video came with its own set of crazy circumstances that made me act. I've had minimal involvement with Jason Malachi, Leachim Noskcaj, Mjviva, The Main Attraction, Tom Fox and others due to the reason stated above.
Now, why PPPYT stood out from that crowd? It was because I saw a video by @AppleHeadLives and I saw the song Perla that peaked my interest on Tom Fox's soundcloud page. Perla is translated to Pearl from Spanish. Of course, even as a child, I related the song "Mama's Pearl" to me, so anything with my name and MJ is fun for me, if nothing else.
As I was researching, I learned more about PPPYT and The Main Attraction to which I've known about for over a year, but wasn't interested enough to do much about them. I didn’t even respond to PPPYT emails with any type of real enthusiasm.
Until a series of coincidences started happening with PPPYT. Over the phone (with any friend MJ related or not), I'd talk about the HIV/AIDS epidemic and then PPPYT would tweet links to videos about HIV/AIDS. I'd talk about ghosts and a man wanting another man's girl and then PPPYT would tweet the lyrics to MJ's "Threatened" song. I'd talk about Chris Tucker and then I'd see PPPYT tweet to Chris Tucker. The occurences of these coincidences seemed strange and at first, I dismissed them as nothing, but the frequency made me pay attention. OK, so now my interest is sparked with great enthusiasm. How is it possible, I speak on something and then see a PPPYT tweet about it within the same day or even within hours or minutes after I’ve discussed certain topics with a friend?
Then PPPYT contacts me and we talked via skype for hours. During our very friendly and giggly conversations, he mentions chicken curry is one of his favorite foods, which is the dinner I had the first night we talked via skype. By now, you can imagine how spooked I am.
Now, how could all these coincidences be so real and accurate? I have spent the last 7 years in the world of Michael JOE Jackson, and this is the first time I've ever talked with a mystery man who sounds so much like him, with the exception of Brandon Howard, who sounds, moves, and looks just like MJ in every aspect and then to have the two of them collide with a matching date and topic is just too much. You see, I agreed to do a B Howard interview on June 9, 2011, then to receive a "thank you for doing the interview 09" message from PPPYT the same date of June 9, 2011 was an unrealistic coincidence, just as PPPYT tweets a picture of hot chocolate and then to hear Chris Tucker tell a MJ story about hot chocolate at an MJ event just a few days later raised my suspicions to levels never reached.
Furthermore, June 9, 2009 (09 is written at the end of the above mentioned email I received from PPPYT regarding B Howard's interview-See video "Wink wink nod nod" on
http://www.MichaelJacksonInsider.com to see for yourself) is the date of the mistake on the verdict form for Dr. Conrad Murray and Judge Michael Pastor corrected it to state June 25, 2009 (see mjhoaxevidence video for this and more on June 9, 2009
Conrad Murray Trial Analysis-- 6 Reasons That May Confirm a DEATH HOAX
Externer Inhalt
Durch das Abspielen werden Daten an Youtube übermittelt und ggf. Cookies gesetzt.
)
I wanted to write this letter to MJ's beloved fan community so you have more insight why PPPYT became worthy enough for me to make videos about. For more info, watch the “Wink Wink Nod Nod” and the “Michael Jacksons Real or Fake?” videos.
As far as Brandi/Maura (covet7secrets) is concerned, she is not taking full responsibility for creating a tense relationship between her and I. The videos I've done regarding PPPYT have NOTHING to do with her. She interjected herself into this with hasty viciousness and not respect for another fellow death hoax investigator. Then without any provocation on my behalf, tweets “Pearl Jr is a grown-ass woman she knows Peter is not Michael”. As if she can read my mind. No one knows any full reasons why people do what they do and the same goes for me, but I do know FACTS and I report them as I see them—that is, if I choose to report them at all. I do know more and I’ll divulge more when, or if, I feel the time is right.
And unlike Brandi stating she doesn’t give a F--- about MJ’s fans, I do care about Michael’s fans AND Michael. Michael loves his fans and I’ve learned to respect and appreciate his fan base as well. Brandi says she knows for a FACT that PPPYT is not Michael and I’m OK with that and have never called her a liar or disagreed with her on this. Her FACTS are only hers because she hasn’t revealed any of them to the fans or me. I’m telling you what I know and have experienced is all. Brandi’s latest video here about PPPYT seemingly makes mockery of my video title:
http://www.youtube.com/user/MJFanFOREVERAndADAY?blend=1&ob=0 Compare the titles of hers and mine and you’ll see she’s clowning when she states she isn’t being disrespectful—this falls in line with throwing the rock and hiding the hand. At least my videos contain supporting FACTS—she just rambles on and says she doesn’t have to prove her facts. I know Brandi is only 23 years old. Wisdom, maturity and some self-controlling of emotions come with age, I’m hoping.
Let’s be clear, I never confirmed that PPPYT is Michael! I'm telling a story based on FACTS. Secondly, to be accused of purposely misleading or downright lying to fans is the ultimate insult to my profession and me. These comments by Brandi just incited an already on-the-edge atmosphere that exist within MJ's fan base; unfortunately due to this very frustrating mysterious saga about whether Michael JOE is dead or alive that has been going on for the last 2 and a half years.
I have and NEVER will intentional lie on anything or to anyone. I'm NOT a liar and have NEVER been.
Now, to address the accusations of being a thief. Information is information. I'm an investigative journalist who happens to have landed in the MJ world to which this is my CURRENT focus. This I did not chose--it was just destined by God or just FATE, but I'm here and have been here since 2005. Every research book has references. Every writer of any similar-type book will call upon information discovered by others. This is necessary for credibility proving theories or situations are the thoughts and actions of the saga and not just the author’s perspective. Research books are a collection of facts, theories and ideas. The scholarly community relishes books with lots of references because it provides a much larger scope of study. “Pseudocide Did Michael Jackson Fake His Death To Save His Life” and “Alive! Is Michael Jackson Really Dead?” has over 250 credits/references, which is on the high side of references of any research book or documentary. The fan community should be reassured because of all the credits/references there is a wide variety of people discovering elements that lead to the same conclusion that Michael Jackson faked his death. It’s just not the author who believes in the thesis/premise.
How can someone STEAL information when they are writing a book? Information is available for anyone who discovers it from whatever sources it is discovered. That is what INVESTIGATION IS, THE DISCOVERY OF INFORMATION FROM A MYRIAD OF SOURCES. It is only infringement (stealing) when someone copies someone else’s body of work. This I did not do. No one has collected this massive amount of information (115,000 words=525 page manuscript) and put it in a book form and copyrighted it but I. My EmovieBook was a massive undertaking and I’m proud of the work by the fans and myself for having something for history in the case MJ comes back or doesn’t comeback. Heck Elvis’ death hoax is a part of history and Michael is a bigger star than Elvis.
Anyone can write a book or produce a documentary, not just I, but I'm the one who put in the work to get it done, so don't hate the messenger. Clues to the death hoax are everywhere on the internet and I did ALL I could to give credit to whomever I discovered it from. Information is circulated via the internet's public domain system for anyone in the world to view, use or circulate. I don't know who discovered what clue first, so I gave credit to whomever I discovered them from—it could have been clues from another just circulated by someone else—so who really knows who found what first. Plus, people can come to the same conclusion or have a similar idea even if they have never collaborated or viewed one another’s work.
Giving credit was so important to me that I now have a patent on my EmovieBook invention-all because I cared about others. I developed a book that can be read and watched. I put in links to videos the fans made so the reader can know the death hoax is a grouped effort and not just mine; therefore creating the first ever EmovieBook. Links can come and go, but to have them included is better than not having them.
The MJ death hoax was NOT something I believed in for the first 8 months since the death announcement. (not a year folks, heck my EmovieBook Pseudocide came out before the first anniversary of the death announcement so get it right-published May 2010). Therefore of course, I'm not the ONLY investigator--we are a fan community of Michael JOE Jackson's and we are a family all seeking answers. Despite the controversy surrounding my work, one thing no one complains about is the thoroughness of my work. It is well inclusive of everything I could find so to offer those who don’t know a way to know it all. So those making the reckless, baseless and rather naïve accusations about stealing would have had rather important clues not be added to this body of work because someone else discovered it--RIDICULOUS?? Excluding important information is not an option when writing any investigative piece, even when others discovered the information—the input of others simply adds required credibility to the thesis/main point.
Lastly, the accusation that I'm just in it to make money is laughable. I could make more money working at McDonald's, but I chose to stick it out for Michael and the fans that care. The MJ death hoax is not something in the mainstream, therefore making money is very difficult. The death hoax audience has not branched out beyond the MJ internet fan community, therefore dramatically limiting my ability to earn a living doing what I do. Cecil had to get a day job, so I can continue my work that is NOT financially stable.
Stating I wrote the EmovieBook or produced the documentary just for money is just a way to be dismissive and doesn’t further our agenda but rather negates the gigantic amount of clues, proof, evidence that MJ faked his death that we all have uncovered. Such statements are just counterproductive.
Now, when the death hoax reaches into the worldwide mainstream public and you see me on national TV, radio or print media, then the possibility of making money becomes a reality and the way this industry works, payment is VERY slow. It takes 6-9 months to get even the smallest of royalty payments.
Believe me I wish I had all this money people are imagining me making and I hope one day to have more money. I'm a mother and have the same financial responsibilities as everyone else. Heck I have to eat and have a roof over my head too! If something doesn’t happen soon, I may have to leave the death hoax community so I can make a livable wage. There are over 10,000 of you dedicated fans to keep up with(and all of you aren't purchasing my products); therefore putting in 10-12 hours a day ensuring I don’t miss anything is my full-time job. And if I don’t state something just perfectly, the judgments are fierce.
Now, one last thing to Brandi, you called me a bitch and have cursed on me. I never did anything of the sort to you. You started this attack, not I. And then to act as if I talked about you badly on a tinychat is throwing the rock and hiding the hand. I only defended myself AFTER you viciously attacked me.
My videos have NOTHING to do with you or PPPYT’s relationship. We never spoke about Brandi until she went on a rampage and both of us were disappointed in her behavior.
Furthermore Brandi, please don’t talk down to me as if I’m a naïve child that just doesn’t get it. I GET IT more than most could even fathom. My record speaks for itself. Check out ALL the coverage we’ve done about the Jacksons on my website:
http://www.MichaelJacksonINsider.com on the bottom, you’ll see I know and have been a part of Michaeling for 7 years now.
Now, for the best part, if PPPYT is not Michael, and I don't know who he is, could it be possible that MJ uses him to keep the MJ persona ALIVE? Michael knew many of his impersonators, so could the voice of PPPYT be a part of the MJ plan? PPPYT admitted to me he knows the Jacksons. No one can deny that he is Michaelish in many ways. PPPYT is very knowledgeable about MJ, therefore it could be possible he is here for us via Michael so we can KEEP MICHAELING? Just my two-cents!
mjneverland schrieb:Jemand hat in Twitter die Karen Faye angeschrieben, ob sie weiss, wer dieser Hutmann ist. Links im Bild. Sie fragte nur zurück, ob es eine Fangfrage sei, mehr hat sie nichts dazu geäußert.
