@Puschelhasi wenn es doch kein "ethnisches" Problem ist, warum beziehst Du es dann nur auf schwarze Väter, warum schaust Du nicht, was ALLE Väter gemeinsam haben könnten, die ihre Familien verlassen, bzw. schaust erst einmal, WODURCH die Abwesenheit der Väter überhaupt zustande kam? Sind sie tot, haben sie eine andere Familie, sind sie im Gefängnis, will die Mutter sie nicht sehen, wohnen sie zu weit weg, fehlt das geld um sie besuchen etc., was resultiert aus der Abwesenheit? Ist das Resultat bei jeder "Hautfarbe" gleich?
Why would this be so? Why would the loss of a biological father reduce a child’s chances of success? We argue that when fathers live apart from their child, they are less likely to share their incomes with the child, and, consequently, mothers and children usually experience a substantial decline in their standard of living when the father moves out. We estimate that as much as half of the disadvantage associated with father absence is due to the economic insecurity and instability. Another quarter is due to the loss of parental time and supervision, and the rest is probably due to a loss of social capital attributable in large measure to the higher incidence of residential mobility among single mothers and remarried mothers. Stated differently, if parents who decide to live apart were able to cushion their child from the economic instability and disruptions in neighborhood ties that often accompany the breakup of a family, and if single mothers were able to establish and maintain regular routines and effective systems of supervision, their children would likely do just as well as children raised in two-parent families. The problem is, these objectives are very difficult to achieve.......
In our analyses, the latter hypothesis dominates. Proportionally, father absence appears to hurt the educational success of white youth more than other racial and ethnic groups. Living without a father increases the risk of dropping out of school by 150 percent among Anglo children. In contrast, father absence increases the school failure risk among African Americans and Hispanics by 75 percent and 96 percent respectively. Remarkably, growing up without a father in the home appears to nullify the educational advantage of being white. Anglo children from one-parent households are significantly more likely to drop out than blacks from two-parent homes, and they are nearly as likely to experience school failure as blacks from similarly disrupted families.......
Race seems to be a factor in the incidence of early child-bearing among offspring of single parents just as it does with school failure. The effect of father absence is proportionately greater among Anglos, though overall rates of teenage mothering are lower. According to NLSY data, white females from a disrupted family have a 14 percentage point greater risk of becoming a teen mother than white females from two-parent families (22 percent, as compared with 8 percent). For blacks, the figures are 40 percent and 26 percent, respectively; and for Hispanics, they are 46 percent and 24 percent. Favorable economic circumstances heighten the odds against early child-bearing for both blacks and whites, yet being from a non-intact family still increases the risk for both racial groups. For advantaged whites, the risk is 5 times greater for those with family disruption; for advantaged blacks, it is twice as high......etc etc
les das mal alles und schau Dir die Statistiken an.......und dann können wir ja weiter reden
http://apps.olin.wustl.edu/macarthur/working%20papers/wp-mclanahan2.htm (Archiv-Version vom 06.06.2013)so hier noch mal was zu Vätern und warum sie die Familie verlassen
http://www.wnd.com/2007/06/42117/http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cultural-animal/200806/fathers-who-leave
Puschelhasi schrieb:Wenn man nun das Modell der Ethnie also der vermeintlichen rassischen Begruendung naehme um diese These widerlegen zu koennen, weil ich denke dass es ein Armutsproblem ist und kein ethnisches. Wie muesste man da vorgehen, bzw. geht das ueberhaupt?
